An approved issue becomes a review-ready PR.
With evidence against the acceptance criteria and a plain account of what remains uncertain. Start smaller: connect a repo and get a second review of the PRs you already have, before anything writes code.
A second reviewer first. An engineer when you are ready.
A second review of the PRs you already have
Connect a GitHub repo and the QA Teammate reviews the pull requests your team is already opening, with inline findings checked against the issue and your repo's conventions. It does not replace your review. It adds the useful findings your existing review missed.
Evidence, not narration
When the Engineer Teammate opens a PR, the body carries its test plan with command output: the test that failed before the change and passes after it, mapped to the acceptance criteria.
Uncertainty stated, not hidden
Every PR the Engineer Teammate opens ends with what remains uncertain and the questions only a human can answer, so your reviewer knows where to look.
A human approves
Findings are advisory. Teammates open, review and fix pull requests. Your team approves them, and nothing merges without that approval.
From issue to merge, every step leaves a record.
-
1
Issue
You approve an issue in your tracker. Nothing starts without one.
-
2
Spec
The Product Teammate interviews you and writes numbered acceptance criteria into the issue.
-
3
Failing, then passing tests
The Engineer Teammate writes the test first, shows it failing for the stated reason, then makes it pass.
-
4
QA findings
The QA Teammate reviews the PR against the spec, your repo's past failure patterns and its conventions. The Engineer answers every finding.
-
5
Human approval
Your team reads the trail and approves. Nothing merges without it.
What a teammate on its own server does that a per-seat review tool does not.
Runs your code, not just reads it
The Engineer Teammate works on a dedicated server that keeps your repo checked out and runs your tests before it opens a PR.
Remembers your repository's past failures
Review comments and fix PRs feed a failure-pattern file for your codebase. The engineer and the reviewer both read it before their next pass.
Implements as well as reviews
The same lane that reviews your PRs can take an approved issue to a pull request when you want it to.
Teammates are not billed per seat
Seats are for the people on your account. The product, engineer and QA teammates share one server, so the lane costs a server, not three more seats.
One engineering lane, priced at list.
Product, engineer and QA teammates on one server. Templates and setup are free. You pay for the seats of the people on your account, the server and model usage, like any other Teammate. Teammates themselves are not billed per seat.
| 2 team seats for the people on your account (2 × $50) | $100/mo |
| Server: Standard Medium (2 vCPU / 8 GB) | $108/mo |
| Model usage at provider list rates (example) | $200/mo |
| Example monthly total | $408/mo |
Cost ceiling
Model usage draws from a prepaid account balance. With automatic top-up off, your teammates stop when the balance runs out instead of running up a bill. With it on, you choose the threshold and the top-up amount.
Book a 20-minute look at the demo repository.
We will walk you through a repository where our own product, engineer and QA teammates work in the open: issues, specs, pull requests, findings and the human approval. Then we talk about your repo.